On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, James Purchase wrote: > I'm not adverse to the awarding of Honorable Mention prizes, but I don't > want to offend our judging panel nor to give the public the idea that I/we > on this committee think that we disagree with their decisions. If we DO > ultimately decide to go that route, I think that the issue of WHO actually > gets those Honorable Mention awards would have to be entirely in the hands > of the Judges and NOT able to be influenced by this committee. Of course. It should all be in the hands of the judges. > In other > words, we would have to instruct the Judging Panel that in addition to the > "win, place and show" awards, they have the ability to award "x" number of > Honorable Mentions as well, each of which would get a merchandise prize. The > judges would have to be entirely free to decide which aquascapes (if any) > actually merit such a distinction. With the "win, place and show" awards, > the Judges have no such discretion - there are 3 awards per category and > they HAVE to be awarded. With the "Honorable Mention" type of award, it is > left the the collective discretion of the judging panel to decide, based > upon the qualities of the aquascapes they are presented with. Remember also that because the judges are scoring numerically, we automatically have full rankings for every entry. > What do you folks think about us allowing/requesting the Judges to award a > discretionary number of "Honorary Mention" awards? If we agree to this, how > many such awards should we allow for - 3, 4, 5, 6? As many as we have leftover prizes? - Erik -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest When asked, log in as username is "aga-contest", and password "lookie-loo".