1. lack of cropping. People take a photo of 8-foot long, 12" high tank, and it gets uploaded as a 4:3 photo. Ends up looking like watching a letterboxed movie from hell. And to make things worse, in the new "mega monitor" mode I added last year, the main photo is resized based on the number of pixels in it, not its width...so those black bars count. So I have probably gone in and re-cropped about 25-40 photos in the past day.
1a. adding frames photos. Leaving photos uncropped is one thing. But there are people who decide there needs to be a big black frame around their photo. Why? I don't know. But their photos only end up looking smaller in the show. And I have to go in and re-crop them all anyway.
2. planting plans with the text in the photos. This one drives me absolutely bonkers. The entrant HAD to have typed in all that stuff in photoshop. And half of the texts are unreadable at 400 width, the others look ridiculously huge at higher resolution. Worse, there's a place to do it all -- in the caption for the photo, or the plant description. One would think that the way all the previous years' entries look once edited, folks might get the hint. But I have probably re-typed 10-20 planting plan contents -- and cropped the names off the plan itself.
2a. planting plans that aren't really planting plans at all. A lot of people have now interpreted "planting plan" to mean "legend". It's not. It's supposed to show how you planted the tank. But instead now we're getting desaturated copies of the main photo with numbers added. That's OK, but I can't help but thinking it'd be nice if we had more simple drawings showing what the planter intended.
Our little prop worked, and the photo shoot last night was a success. Now I have 5 hours of photoshopping to do. Ah well. :)
- Erik -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest