So a third robo-mail then? Ho-kay... Will do. - Erik On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Bailin Shaw wrote:
My suggestion would be to send them the robo-mail and call it good. If they do not respond, then I can contact them and try to get a response. If after that we get nothing, then we censor them as we have in the past. Bailin i'm EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD Join me > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:58:04 -0700 > From: erik@thekrib.com > To: aga-contest@thekrib.com > Subject: [AGA-Contest] Delinquents? > > Hi folks (Bailin), > > As always, there are a large number of delinquents in entry fees and > release forms -- 14 no-forms and 7 no-fees (though there are 3-4 that are > no-both). I have been through two rounds of automated e-mails with > everyone. > > Question: How to proceed now? > > 1. Send another round of robo-mails to the remaining list? > 2. Have "someone" from a different location handle the remaining folks? > (Volunteers?) > 3. Do nothing, and censor the delinquent entries? > > Suggestions welcome! > > - Erik > > -- > Erik Olson Sent from my crusty old Linux box > erik at thekrib dot com > _______________________________________________ > AGA-Contest mailing list > AGA-Contest@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest
-- Erik Olson Sent from my crusty old Linux box erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest