At 10:12 AM 9/23/99 -0400, Robert P. Cashin wrote: >Hi Everybody, > > I agree with Karen about almost all she said. She was right, I was >trying to keep to the original suggestion of having a decision by 9/19. I >recognize one mistake I made here, I assumed Dave didn't answer because >he couldn't come up with one that would be satisfactory. Since I am >available pretty much all the time, I lost sight of the fact that >everyone else isn't. On that basis it is right to reopen the discussion >and I retract my vote. Thank you! > Please remember, I am trying to find my way as chair using a new media >and will make some mistakes. My previous experience as chair of national >orgs was with a once a month letter/email format. I _fully_ understand that you are new at this, and that it also wasn't running _that_ great when you took it on!<g> One of the tjings that I found overwhelming, but didn't know how to control were these E-mail discussions. I may have erred on the side of letting things go on too long, but I think it's important not to let an important conversation like this one get cut short. >One of the reasons I >suggested the idea of doing a job description for the chair was to give >me an idea of how the AGA members wanted the organization to be run. I think this is an excellent suggestion, and that we should eventually do job descriptions for all positions. It was actually on the to-do list way back. It's just another one of those things that we haven't "gotten around to".<g> > It seems like Robert's rules of order is one. I don't know that everyone else wants to use Robert's rules, but they're there because they work. If someone else has a better, fair suggestion, I'm completely open to suggestions. > Karen, I have no problem with you releasing your message as it stands to >the MC. I would like you to include my message too so they know where I >am coming from too. Absolutely! I'll forward all three posts to the MC. Karen