[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: Previous e-mail; lawyer



Hooray Hooray for Bob McCaw.
We really have to have this done before we can enter into any agreement with Dave Gomberg about PAM.
Mary -- can I push a little further??? Would Bob be willing to read any draft agreement that Gomberg and I put together, since I am sure as hell not going to commit AGA to anything without an attorney reading the docs.
Thanks.
Lass

Mary McCaw wrote:

Bob,     Oops!  I wanted my husband to read my last e-mail before I sent it, and he was trying to make himself a copy by e-mailing it to himself.  On our computer one can't print a draft.  So my e-mail went off unedited.  I didn't have the opportunity to reconsider what I wanted to say.  Too late!  I will just add this to clarify what I said about Dave.  I got to know Dave a little on the Amazon trip.  He has a lot of good qualities.  I don't really dislike him, but he has a lot of rough edges that make him difficult to work with.     As some of you know, my husband is an actuary and a tax lawyer with a lot of business experience.  He is in partnership with an accountant.  He has been following our PAM deliberations with interest, sometimes even reading my e-mails before I get a chance to see them!  He proposes the following:  he will do the incorporation and file for non-profit status without a fee. Mary