Convention Ad in PAM

[Karen Randall <krandall@world.std.com>]

>        "Dave ... suggested that AGA might want to take another page for
>advertising our Chatanooga conference, the contest, etc.  This was
>motivated, in part, by him not getting as many ads sold as projected and
>he is trying to attain the projections.  The charge would be
>$300/page/issue.  I told him I would bring this to the SC and am doing so
>now.  When the issue is decided, either Erik or I can let him know,
>depending on how you want to handle the issue of who is in charge."

I am very supportive of PAM, and of seeing PAM and AGA work together to the
benefit of both.  In this instance, however, I see little or no possibility
of a $300 ad in a magazine with a subscription base of less than 400 being
able to give the AGA any return on its investment.  I would sugggest that
we thank Dave for the offer, but decline.

Karen