Oops! (PAM Ad issue #1 vs. PAM Ad issue #2)

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

Just to clarify the two previous e-mails, the discussion is about to close
on whether to take out a $300 full-page ad in PAM #3, so that we can vote
and give Dave an answer.  ("PAM Ad Issue #1")

Discussion is now OPEN on on the new issue of whether we should change our
"exchange" ad in PAM #4 to reflect the conference. ("PAM Ad Issue #2")

My suspicion is that we will quash this second issue pretty quickly based
on PAM's publishing schedule... Even if it gets back on time, the
earliest we'd see #4 would be Mid-November, right?  So we would not be
able to present any useful information on the conference.

It is unfortunate that the timing is bad (Dave calls Bob with 1 week left
before publication. Bob e-mails Erik.  Erik forwards e-mail to list 16
hours later. List is read 24+ hours later).  We cannot give Dave an answer
right now, but I think by sticking with our ~1 week of discussion and then
a quick vote afterward, then we will be more expedient than Dave has seen
us in the past.

  - Erik

-- 
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com