At 03:12 AM 10/27/2000 -0700, you wrote: >I was wondering if we (the AGA) have rights to include the old "AAGA" >publication in our archive? I know that Neil started TAG with Volume 4 to >correspond somehow with Volumes 1-3 of this older publication, but was >that merely a courtesy gesture? Just curious. I view AGA as a continuation of AAGA.