On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Neil Frank wrote: > At 09:48 AM 11/17/2000 -0800, you wrote: > >On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 nfrank@mindspring.com wrote: > > > >> First, James says that "It must be kept in mind as well that the > >> Copyright of all images remains with the individual entrants and while > >> the AGA can publish them, (with attribution), it would be necessary > >> for anyone else to obtain permisssion from the indivdual entrants as > >> well." It seems to me that Gomberg would have to get permission and > >> probably pay the entrant for publishing them in his magazine. > > > >I don't think that's necessary, because it's OK for the AGA to publish > >them in other magazines as part of promoting the event. We specifically > >had that clause in, to allow us to publish this exact sort of thing. We > >had talked about promos in AFM for next year, for instance. > > How about clarifying that point on the AGA-MCM for James and the others. > Another thing... I am a little confused about seeing james and dave's posts > to the AGA-MCM. Are they getting all the mails. That may affect how I say > things in the future. Neil Okay! So there it is, reproduced for all to see. We have rights to publish all the photos in the contest. James knows that. Dave does not, yet. I will clarify Dave when appropriate, since he's REALLY going off on a tangent again with his last message. Second point: neither of them receives the MC list. I have been manually cc'ing them on relevant mail, so when they reply, they end up cc'ing to the MC as well. - Erik -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com