That I understand. Thanks. sh --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Cheryl Rogers wrote: > > > These numbers were generated with the last TAG mailing, > which was just before > > the convention. No, I don't think we got many more > members out of it. BUT > > folks are still renewing; I have only sent one renewal > notice since the > > convention. > > As I just mentioned to Scott, keep in mind that (1) all > those fly-by-night > members who joined in 2003 for the convention would now > be expiring just > as any new ones for 2004 joined, and (2) I don't think > there were a lot of > simultaneous membership/convention regs (my gut says > 10-15). > > >> If we were to hold steady at about this level and > non-us > >> memberhips were increasing, we'd have an even > unhappier > >> situation. > > > > I don't understand. > > Scott is suggesting that if membership is being held > steady at a constant > number (say 800) and non-US memberships are increasing, > then simple math > would say that US membership must be decreasing. > However, this is not the > case... in fact, membership, as I pointed out a few days > back, is actually > going UP overall. When we did the big purge in spring of > 2003, we had 776 > members left. That year we got it up to 841, and then > 835. In 2004, > membership was 818, 845, 881 and 850 for the four > mailings, significantly > BETTER than 2003. So the premise that membership is > staying constant just > simply isn't true. However, US membership is > statistically constant, the > datapoints for TAG mailings being: 664 (purge), 716, 712, > 685, 704, 739, > 708. > > - Erik > > -- > Erik Olson > erik at thekrib dot com > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm