Imo, it's the author that has to make the big sweep before proofing eyes try to fine tune and make corrections. Proofers can eliminate words that obviously serve no semantic purpose, such as "in order" in the phrase "in order to" and changing "path of the gadren" to "garden path" without any loss of meaning. But heavier cutting, although painful, can be accomplished if one careful looks for redundancies between paragrpahs, longer-winded phrasings, introductory phrases and interjections that can be implicit rather than expressed, etc. Every word must carry it's weight, must add to the meaning. The rest are merely expletives, in the normal, non-watergate sense. But the author should be the first to dispell the lesser of his or her linguistic progeny. Just by rule of thumb, a full page or so could probably be cut from the article without losing helpful content and Ben might try that as a goal, despite how artifical it sounds. What remains will be that which he most certainly feels is neceassary and the terrific job he's done already will be made even better, the concision making the language more powerful. And of course, always avoid passive voice, which is the wimpiest of liguistic forms, limp in its wordy reluctance to pronounce the subject. You can share this with Ben if you think it would be helpful. I cetainly do not mean to be offensive. but it might be better coming for another. Now, off the soap box and back to figuring out what the heck my job is. sh --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@rightstuffwebsites.com> wrote: > Karen Randall wrote: > > > >> Quick note. Ask Ben for one last edit to eliminate > > > > > That was my thought, too, when I read it. I don't know > if there's time > > Don't worry, he *wants* the help. I forwarded him Erik's > comments for > approval and he respondedthat that's just the sort of > thing he needs. > He's a professional doctor of pharmacology, not a > professional author. > He'll get better with practice and gentle handling. I'm > used to dealing > with these folks, and so are you Karen. With Equine > Research books I was > dealing with horsepeople, not authors. We *made* them > into authors. AGA > can do the same with Ben. > > > > >> Send back and ask Amano for one last edit-wash ... > whoops, > >> can't do that with him, can we? > > > > > > Boy, I'd love to. But _I'm_ not gonna tell him that... > are you!<g> > > BTW, I _do_ change some of them, but only those that > make very little > > sense in English. > > Sorry, folks, I'm not that reticent. I'll edit anyone if > they need it, > or if I don't like that hyphen there, or I need one more > line on this > page dammmit, etc. Anyway, how's he gonna know? :-) But > it doesn't come > up that often, because our dear Tomoko is *so* good it's > nearly seamless. > > Cheryl > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > Plants and DVDs for sale at the AGA table at the ACA 2005 Annual Convention, Fort Worth, Texas on July 21-24, 2005. ACA Convention Details at http://www.aca2005.org/ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Share the fun; show your work. The AGA's Sixth Annual International Aquascaping Contest is open. Find about about here: http://showcase.aquatic-gardeners.org _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm