Paul,
I agree with Phil, on all points. We will not be
asking moderators to create the traffic just moderate
it when necessary. And hopefully add some of their
experience when they desire.
There is no technological substitute for experience,
at least none that I have found.
Besides it just would not be the same having an AGA
forum without a Central Mississipi weather report ;-).
Regards,
Larry
--- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote:
Paul,
One of the foci I feel is important to stress for
moderators on a potential
AGA forum is that they're not around to keep
discussion going or to have a
certain number of posts per unit time. They're
around to keep things polite
and that's about it. You've got a level head and a
lot of experience that
many people in the hobby can gain from. Just
because we've made large
technological strides doesn't mean we totally
understand what we can do with
them and how they affect our plants.
Experimentation is a good thing and I
think is something the AGA would like to support.
Regards,
Phil
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm