[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-mcm] Potential AGAF staff
- To: AGA Advisory Committee <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] Potential AGAF staff
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=alUx0d9ozs0LFYOyQA9O2He9duUonomUce/0PHhSMK28dNKlk/E1oz3tk7zId4b3ACoYi725eN8j9KTbJSu6Cq2mYfen0v9rSkADjEJfGXW+5JathIwvmZViwfMl7ganI3bQTus6OMjVsP15JJ/9ycnuC3ziPOzbyAAE9xlkEXg= ;
What do you envisage to be AGA's role re expermentats?
sh
--- Paul Krombholz <pkrombholz@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Phil,
> I would like to be involved in an experimentation forum,
> and I think
> the APC people are not particularly interested in that.
> I would be
> happy to work in that area. I still think that AGA ought
> to think
> carefully about the time and expense of going down the
> road towards a
> be-all-for-everybody forum. I know AGA doesn't have a
> convention
> coming up next November, but does everybody have to be up
> to their
> ears and beyond in responsibilities all the time?
>
> Experimentation is a difficult thing to support, and AGA
> has tried it
> in the past. We had a research committee, and I sort of
> recall we
> finally got an article out of it by Matthew Mason after
> endless
> person-hours of wrangling. I can't remember the details,
> but we
> almost had a total falling out with Diana Walstad, among
> other
> things. What I am thinking of is something much more
> casual---a
> forum where people who are interested in doing
> experiments talk. I
> have some experience doing experiments with aquatic
> plants, and a
> pretty good feel for the good old 'scienterrific method':
>
> question---hypothesis---experiment development process.
> These
> experiments should not be big deals where the
> experimenter wants to
> get funding from AGA for equipment or anything like that.
> Funding
> should be strictly on your own! If AGA sets up a fund
> for supporting
> experiments, all kinds of people will come out of the
> woodwork mainly
> wanting to get their hands on tanks and equipment.
>
> It is surprisingly difficult to find people actually
> willing to do an
> experiment. I can think of a bunch of experiments that
> ought to be
> done in the area of improving survival of plants during
> and just
> after shipping. I mentioned some things to try on APC,
> but nobody
> was interested in doing any experiments. For example: I
> have had a
> lot of freshly cut and shipped stem plants die on me,
> such as
> Ludwigia inclinata var. Pantanal. I have an hypothesis
> that the
> stems would ship a lot better if they were floated for a
> week or so
> before shipping. This would give the stem time to seal
> over the cut
> end and start some roots. It would be a simple
> experiment to do.
> Bag up and box some stems that have floated for a week
> and some
> freshly cut stems and see which comes out in better
> shape. But, I
> couldn't get anybody interested in doing the experiment,
> just a
> statement that fresh cut stems would surely be the best
> way to ship.
>
> Just think of the number of experiments that could be
> done to answer
> the following questions (and that is not all the
> questions that could
> be asked):
>
> What affects the survival of plants during shipping
> (excluding
> temperatures during shipping)?
> a. The health and state of nutrition of the plant?
> b. Emersed versus submersed plants?
> c. Freshly cut stems versus stems that have been allowed
> to float and heal?
> d. Amount of mechanical agitation of plant during
> shipping?
> e. Amount of water with the plant?
> f. Amount of air (ventilation)?
> g. Treatment with plant hormones?
>
>
> >Paul,
> >
> >One of the foci I feel is important to stress for
> moderators on a
> >potential AGA forum is that they're not around to keep
> discussion
> >going or to have a certain number of posts per unit
> time. They're
> >around to keep things polite and that's about it.
> You've got a
> >level head and a lot of experience that many people in
> the hobby can
> >gain from. Just because we've made large technological
> strides
> >doesn't mean we totally understand what we can do with
> them and how
> >they affect our plants. Experimentation is a good thing
> and I think
> >is something the AGA would like to support.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Phil
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >AGA-mcm mailing list
> >AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> >http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
>
>
> --
> Paul Krombholz in sunny central Mississippi
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm