[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-mcm] [Fwd: Re: Update on supplies of the bulbs]
- To: AGA Advisory Committee <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] [Fwd: Re: Update on supplies of the bulbs]
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Bclz/01IK7FgAOznOmMp9RzFJDBrQ8S4Cj02Ca162QPzb6NZcFsrX2U9Tx/uGXE4lVLDMdaJ8Qh3khk8PIL421VbqAe5RLfrJEc6Gr2vOu1PlpzF/PY/v0nqrAtWzsbOi+iDt7e/I8YbPP0HL3Ky0QfCCjlgg1qNSX5pPzQJUL0= ;
It always makes me nervous when the "experimenter" has
formed strong conclusions prior to the actual experiment.
We don't need to deny or endorse; we really have nothing
tangible to go on.
I think we should just keep replying simply with, "Draft a
proposal describing purpose, test hypothesis, and the
protocol, and the Board will review the proposal."
My personal guess is that he'll never write up anything
decent because he hasn't a decent experiment in mind. Just
watch plants grow with a bunch of diff bulbs -- egads!
People have been doing that for years. Scientific? What
utter poppycock -- and I reserve that word for only very
special use.
sh
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm