Yeah, I didn't think about it like that but you are right. --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > Basically the US equivalent of Amano's annual party. > I'm OK with it. > > - Erik > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Larry Lampert wrote: > > > I CAN'T BELIEVE I AM ACTUALLY GOING TO POST THIS > RIGHT > > NOW BUT HERE GOES......... > > > > As usual I am really ready for a > post-fish-conference > > rest but I think I need to post this sooner rather > > than later........ > > > > What if we had a conference but it wasn't an AGA? > > > > What if it did not cost anything but still had a > nice > > venue? > > > > What if it still had several quality speakers but > no > > speaker costs? > > > > What if we had no formal banquet, no fancy > schedules, > > no external audio video needs? > > > > What if we did not even have to deal with > registration > > at all? > > > > > > What if we could actually hang out with the > members > > instead of working and just saying hello as we run > > from one place to the other? > > > > I am not proposing an AGA but rather a > less-than-AGA > > event to stand in it's place for continuity > purposes. > > It would be more organized than a Plantfest but > > nothing near an AGA. > > > > Jeff Senske and I are toying with the idea of > having > > an event at his gallery. The venue could hold 75 > > people maybe more. Jeff, Mike and possibly Luis > could > > speak. Jeff is going to ask them first so please > do > > not say anything to anyone. > > > > The proposed schedule would be a Friday tour of > the > > top five AGA mainteained tanks in Houston. > Everyone > > would be responsible for their own rides. > Saturday, we > > would have three talks in the gallery and a little > AGA > > auction or just a plant swap. We would recommned a > > couple of hotels but no contracts. > > > > Jeff has a little PA system and I can get a > projector. > > He can get some food catered in cheap and I think > I > > can get him to eat (pardon the pun) the costs > anyway. > > After all suckers like me will be buying the ADA > > goodies while we are there ;-). > > > > I am not ready to jump on this yet but I wanted to > see > > what you guys think b4 doing anything else. Jeff > and I > > talked for an hour or so about this and a few > other > > things. I think it is doable as long as we present > it > > as what it is and what it's not (an AGA). > > > > Think about it and let me know. If there is > interest > > on our part I will get the ball rolling if not I > will > > let Jeff know now before we go an further. > > > > --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> Got off the phone with Jim from SFBAAPS just now. > >> Confirmed that they are > >> still shooting for November 2006 date for > >> convention, so any contact with > >> vendors about Feb 2006 is going on entirely in > said > >> person's mind. > >> > >> They visited four hotels back in March, at least > two > >> of them in the > >> $100/night range. DG didn't like any of the four > >> because they weren't > >> classy enough, and instead concentrated on > Officer's > >> Club. When Officer's > >> Club deal fell through, he bailed on the process > and > >> didn't pick up any of > >> the other hotels. > >> > >> No progress in last two months (Jim blames > himself), > >> but there is a > >> monthly open house/meeting next Sunday where > he'll > >> bring it up. Members > >> are geographically separate, and e-mail > >> communication doesn't work well. > >> Jim had written up a proposed agenda, but then > >> someone posted it on > >> public APC forms. He's a little leery about that > >> now, but is going to > >> send the document to me. > >> > >> Based on last couple of meetings, members are > >> enthusiastic about the > >> convention, and volunteering. Grassroot support > is > >> there. Club is > >> healthy, about 30-40 paid members and another 20 > >> hangers-on. Club has > >> little organization because they don't need it > for > >> their own operation, > >> and has been detrimental when organization has > been > >> "imposed" on it by an > >> individual. No new info here. > >> > >> Recognizes need for organization in regards to > >> convention. I suggested > >> they concentrate on hotel, noted AGA is in a > pickle > >> because AGA *needs* to > >> have a convention in 2006. We can't just let > >> deadlines expire like we did > >> in 2005. We need to communicate and see progress > on > >> a regular basis or > >> have to seriously investigate other clubs. I > >> mentioned that hotel is > >> lynchpin. He's going to start the hotel work > back > >> up. > >> > >> I hope I am not stepping on any toes here, but > with > >> what's at risk, I've > >> decided to take a bigger stake in making sure > this > >> works. I am going to > >> start calling Jim on a semi-regular basis. I > think > >> that until some > >> progress has occurred, it will be best to do > phone > >> communication. > >> Hopefully we'll get things to the point where > >> planning can move back to > >> the conheads list. > >> > >> - Erik > >> > >> -- > >> Erik Olson > >> erik at thekrib dot com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> AGA-mcm mailing list > >> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AGA-mcm mailing list > > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > -- > Erik Olson > erik at thekrib dot com > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > === message truncated === _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm