Re: [AGA-mcm] Re: AGA Convention info

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Karen Randall wrote:

> B.I.T.C.H.
>
> And, yes, it's for real. (to give you a hint, if Kathy's not a member, she 
> could be, and you know I wouldn't call her names ;-)

She is, sort of.  They indoctrinated her at the 1996 convention when she 
went on her own.  She didn't like the cliquish nature of B.I.T.C.H. 
though, so has never completely participated.

B.I.T.C.H. got in a bit of a tangle with ACA management, because they 
bring in so much money for the conservation funds.  But some are skittish 
about thanking and referring to them as "B.I.T.C.H." in publication, so 
there was a whole proposal to the board (and subsequent week-long 
discussion -- you think ours are bad!) about how they should be referred 
to as "the Babes".  To which, management of B.I.T.C.H. was so ticked that 
they threatened to cut all ties with the ACA and help support a catfish 
club.

  - Eri
--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm