[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: [AGA-mcm] Electronic Re-publishing Article



I'd be interested in hearing what others say about this, especially the mods... but if I were policing it, I would probably allow linking to, but not uploading of copyrighted images. As you know, people can do either in our forum. If it's a link, then the person who actually hosted the images would be liable, not the AGA.

  - Erik

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Karen Randall wrote:

We alway DO check with an author before putting material on the web site. We're pretty careful, probably because I've had my share of being taken advantage of.

I have to say, I'd be ticked to hear that JB was making money (even 10% off articles I'd written for TAG or another hobby magazine. I do that for the organization, not for someone's pocket.


On a similar subject, it worries me that people so lightly scan images from books, or take them from otehr websites to post on the AGA forum. (a practice that is SOP on APC, and has migrated over here) It's different with the AGA contest photos posted on OUR forum... I think our release covers us for that use. But for other photos, if someone challenged it, this is a clear infringement of copyright.

Everyone does this so freely on APC (which really surprises me, considering that Art is a lawyer and should know better) and I know I've always been odd-man-out over there, so the last thing I wanted to do was make waves. (besides, it was no skin off my teeth)

I haven't known quite what to do about it on our forum, though. I hate to slow down traffic, or for us to be percieved as the spoil sports, but we do have some exposure.

Karen

----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com>
To: "AGA Advisory Committee" <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] Electronic Re-publishing Article


Hey, cool!  Guess we did the right thing in how we present the disk.

Interestingly, the ACA was just offered a "service" by John Benn to sell PDFs of individual articles to people online, with John getting 10% of the cut. The ACA declined because in John redoing the articles as standalone PDFs, there were worries that this would be considered a new work rather than a straight reprint/back-issue, and they had not given the authors permission for publishing their work in this manner.

Does make me think, though, that we need to get special permission from an author when we're going to put their article on the website. But I'll bet Cheryl's already thought of that! :)

  - Erik

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Larry Lampert wrote:

Here is an interesting article on a National
Geographic lawsuit concerning electronic content
republishing. Sounds familiar?

Regards,
Larry



<http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051212/tc_nm/court_geographic_dc;_ylt=AkLwaCAAKnQa7vklJJ2o7alT.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl>
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm


--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm



_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm


--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm