Okay, we'll say that. :-) Cheryl S. Hieber wrote: > But we need to say how they will be judged even if it's just to > say, "Awardees well be determined based on the sole and absolute > discretion of the judges." > > sh > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@dustyuniverse.com> > To: AGA Advisory Committee <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:21:34 AM > Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] [Fwd: Re: TAG 21-1 Materials Due December 1st] > > > S. Hieber wrote: > > I think it's a fine idea. Couple of things to be careful about -- Who > > does the picking? And how? > > Greg suggests that he does the initial screening, then he and two other > judges will pick the winner. It shouldn't be hard to find two other > judges that aren't us. > > It needs to be clear what the criteria are > > for judging and that the judge(s) is(are) the sole and final arbiter(s). > > > > Who is collecting the stories? > > TAG would print a solicitation for the stories, so i would gather them > and send them along to Greg, I guess. > > > Cheryl > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com <mailto:AGA-mcm@thekrib.com> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm