Re: Re: PROP 02-03 passes

[<nfrank@mindspring.com>]

thanks for quick reply. Seems like a reasonable policy is that once a vote 
"starts," it can be finished as soon as a majority is received. However, I 
still think it is important to allow a specified amount of time for an 
amendment to offered and accepted (not needed in this case, but might be needed 
in the future).

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:16:34 -0800 (PST) Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:

I think that if it hadn't been basically unanimous, there wouldn't have 
been a timeout.

  - Erik

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 nfrank@mindspring.com wrote:

> 
> i am out of town - since tuesday - reading my email from remote location. I 
> see there was a flurry of email activity on tuesday. I would have voted yes 
> too. [for the archives!] 
> BTW, what is the official timeout period for voting? 
> 
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 07:54:55 -0800 (PST) Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
> 
> Proposal 02-03, to appoint James Purchase as head of solicitations passes 
> 4-0-1 (Neil abstains by timeout).  I will offer James the job.
> 
>   - Erik
> 
> 

-- 
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com

  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".

  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".