Two weeks should be great. Dallas mentioned that they need to know by the end of the month if we want them to do it or not; I suspect that at this point there's no way we can meet this deadline. I tend to think that if Dallas can't do it, the only other viable option is Boston/NEC, and I didn't see a lot of enthusiasm there either. I'm of the opinion we might be better off skipping a year and making 2004 work than killing ourselves to make this year work. So let's go with two weeks. :) - Erik On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, S. Hieber wrote: > Yes. I'll take whatever other comments anyone has to > offer, but I have enough to work with. > > What kind of deadline are you thinking of? I guess if we > work backwards, timewise, from teh next convention, then > we're behind schedule already ;-) . > > Anyhow, I'm thinking a couple of weeks. Will that work > out? > > SH > --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > > Just checking in to make sure we don't derail the > > convention progress too > > much... > > > > Does anyone else have any comments on the convention > > document that Darlene > > sent? If not, Scott, do you think you have the > > information to proceed > > with integrating all the information I've sent you? > > > > - Erik > > > > -- > > Erik Olson > > erik at thekrib dot com > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".