[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: Convention, Texas, and responsibilities



On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, S. Hieber wrote:

> If we expect only a few proposers, then we might leave the
> % of split blank but let them know, informally,. that we're
> sort of expecting 50% on plant auction and reg fees -- or
> something like that.  That way, we've left the door open to
> negotiate the split (on what and how much) rather than
> disuade some prospective proposers from submitting.

Hmm... one small point which I'm not sure anyone is getting is that I am
*not* saying we do a split on plant auction or reg fees, but 50% split on
NET, once bills have been paid.  It is a very important distintion, mainly
because it says that if the convention loses money, then the local club is
responsible 50% (or whatever the split is) of that loss!  The local club
needs to share in that burden.

Now maybe that burden is only 25%; that would be the part that is
negotiated.  But that would still mean they share 25% of the risk.  But I
beleive it is very important that the split be calculated on the NET,
rather than the GROSS income.

  - Erik


> SH
> --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
> > Interesting!
> > 
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, S. Hieber wrote:
> > 
> > > We can let the proposers propose a split or we can
> > specify
> > > it.  The value in doing the former is there only if
> > there
> > > are a large nubmer of competing proposers.  imo.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Dorothy Reimer wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >     Where is TCA? Sorry I don't know.
> > > > 
> > > > TCA is the Texas Cichlid Association.  Nice dedicated
> > > > group of folks
> > > > there, and based out of the Dallas-FtWorth area. 
> > They
> > > > also have FOTAS,
> > > > the Federation of Texas Aquarium Societies, which
> > holds
> > > > an annual
> > > > convention (I think last year that was sponsored by
> > the
> > > > TCA).  And lots
> > > > off their members are also involved with the ACA, so
> > > > they've been involved
> > > > in running conventions.  These are all organizations
> > that
> > > > Houston *should* 
> > > > have been involved with but wasn't.  So in that
> > sense,
> > > > we'd get a totally 
> > > > different (and hopefully larger) crowd!
> > > > 
> > > > > Larry sounds like an active person with some good
> > > > ideas.
> > > > 
> > > > Larry straddles two different organizations, so he
> > has
> > > > contacts with both.  
> > > > He's been on several collecting trips in places like
> > > > Mexico, and has
> > > > written for the BB.  He was the guest speaker on the
> > ACA
> > > > chat room last
> > > > Tuesday, and spoke about aquatic plants!  He could
> > > > probably speak on
> > > > cichlids to the AGA. :)
> > > > 
> > > > The thing that's cool is that Larry's not the only
> > one
> > > > with big ideas
> > > > there.  They've got Tim Cincotta, Bailin Shaw, and a
> > > > bunch of other
> > > > people.  Even Luis from Houston has joined their
> > group. 
> > > > Check their
> > > > website at http://www.aquatic-plants.org It's very
> > nicely
> > > > done.
> > > > 
> > > > > I would like to see it somewhere else than Texas
> > again
> > > > > but would not like to see not have a convention so
> > > > would go there again.  It
> > > > > is not in the same city so would get some different
> > > > ideas.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for checking in Dorothy!  When I'm talking
> > with
> > > > these guys, it's 
> > > > good to have a feel for what the entire board thinks.
> > > > 
> > > > >     I think that if we had our silent plant auction
> > and
> > > > they have a regular
> > > > > auction that this would be a good slit of profits.
> > > > 
> > > > This would probably work for them.  In fact, they'd
> > > > probably get way more 
> > > > profits than the AGA would, because they could
> > arrange a
> > > > positively huge 
> > > > auction.  The Cleveland group, as Mike Meadows
> > mentioned,
> > > > could not get a 
> > > > large auction together and would not make much profit
> > at
> > > > all.
> > > > 
> > > > Like I've said several times now, I'm really starting
> > to
> > > > think we should
> > > > make this a straight 50/50 for everything.  The AGA
> > can
> > > > loan the club
> > > > money for the expenses, but when the smoke clears, it
> > > > would look like
> > > > this:
> > > > 
> > > >         income (registrations + both auctions + raffles but
> > not
> > > > AGA memberships)
> > > >         - all convention expenses (hotel + speakers +
> > > > equipment + tours + PR)
> > > >         = Net profit or loss
> > > > 
> > > > Half Net profit or loss to AGA (plus repayment of
> > loan),
> > > > Half to local
> > > > club (minus repayment of loan).
> > > > 
> > > > Registration is open to either AGA or local club
> > members.
> > > >  This 
> > > > allows people who just want to check out the
> > convention
> > > > locally to 
> > > > get in $20 cheaper.  Non-members must either join the
> > > > local club or 
> > > > the AGA.  Both clubs keep their respective membership
> > > > income (but that's 
> > > > the ONLY area where money is siphoned off the overall
> > > > income).
> > > > 
> > > > The problem with the system we have right now is that
> > the
> > > > only thing the
> > > > local club is encouraged to do is have a big auction
> > of
> > > > their own, and 
> > > > they have no responsibility in the costs.  What I am
> > > > proposing will 
> > > > encourage both the AGA and local club to have a
> > > > profitable convention, a 
> > > > great plant auction, and a great live auction.  And
> > Larry
> > > > just confirmed 
> > > > that this is what the ACA does, which gives me more
> > > > confidence in its 
> > > > feasibility.
> > > > 
> > > > We could always adjust this from 50/50 to 60/40 or
> > 75/25
> > > > in negotiations 
> > > > with the local club.  But I feel it's very important
> > for
> > > > the local club to 
> > > > have some share in the success or failure of the
> > event.
> > > > 
> > > >   - Erik
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Erik Olson
> > > > erik at thekrib dot com
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Erik Olson
> > erik at thekrib dot com
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> 

-- 
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com

  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".