Is this instead of subscriptions? Or does the $100 include subscriptions too. If so, then it all seems like way too much for the money. In any event, I'm inclined to say no to the TAG ad; seems like it's undervaluing the ad space that we're trying (and when I say we, I mean that Karen has put so much work into) to get vendors to cough up real dough for. I think a half page is worth $200. I haven't done a cost out on all the parts of the deal, but jsut thinking that TAGs bring in on about 25cents each, that's not a lot of room to play with. I didn't think your way was confusing -- they get 10 (it was 10 wasn't it?) copies to disseminate as they wish. I don't see any problem with a "membership being treated as an extension of four issues, but the only sane way to pull that off is to treat each of the "subscriptions individually, not as a bulk of ten copies. I don't have anything against doing them individually, it just means we are selling a bunch of subs at once and at a discount. *But* letting the number float based on however many are in the club at a given time seems like the wrong way to go. I think the number should be fixed at the outset of the deal. No to smorgasbord. More comments below. --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote: > They want enough "subscriptions" to have an AGA > membership for each of > their members. I realize that this number may change each > quarter. Naw. To a changing number I'd say, "no." > Anyway, based on this ongoing conversation with sfbaaps > and seeing the > validity of Jeff's point, I would like to revise the > "benefits" of the > Premium Club Program thusly: > > -1 free AGA subscription for your club library > -A complete set of available back issues > -1 free AGA convention DVD > -A link to your club's web site on the AGA web site > -A on-time half-page ad in TAG for your club > -Premium Club discounts with sponsors and vendors when > available > -Free promotional materials regarding the AGA, its > convention, and the > aquascaping contest > -Support and promotion of your local club events from the > AGA > > All for the low low price of $100 annually. (Would you > cross the road for a > free marshmallow?) > > Furhtermore, as you will read below, Jeff has additional > ideas that are not > without merit. > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: AGA/sfbaaps cooperation > Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:17:33 -0700 (PDT) > From: Jeff Kropp <jeff_kropp@yahoo.com> > To: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> > My original primary question was, "how can sfbaaps be > of assistance to the AGA?" Your premium group > membership plan was a reasonable proposal but didn't > anticipate our shared membership ratios. I think your > proposal has stalled because of our interpretation of > that offer ? $16 group memberships and a $40 club fee. > As a result of this ongoing process I see a few parts > that are particularly appealing to the intrests of > sfbaaps: > > *An acknowledged vow of cooperation between local and > national organizations. I don't know what this means. We post a statement that we suport SFBAAPS? What's the commitment? What cooperative behavior is implied? > *possibility of sfbaaps representation in the AGA > decision making process. Buying into the Board? I'm very ambivalent. I'll wait to I hear others' comments on this. > *national club presence in TAG (perhaps a directory of > member clubs in every issue?) Sounds good if we have the space. I'd think this would be Karen's call. But I think it would have to be a list of clubs that ask to be included. If we were condoning or approving any organization as being a good thing to belong to, I think some responsibiility goes along with that that folks aren't going to get into, say, a club that consists of just Steve P. That's a personal view but I think the general point is valid. > *Reciprocal web links and other reciprocal promotions. Again, it needs to be clear what behavior is expected by either party. It would be better if we posted "news" than promoted -- again it's a responsibility and liability issue. Say someone takes a group canoeing down the Thames and one canoe-ful drowns. Did we encourage people to go? Did we imply that it was safe and properly supervised? > *club library of AGA published media. Their library or AGA's. You know my position,move out those old TAGs! > > I might suggest, a revised club membership that > included only 1 TAG subscription and 1 conference DVD > for a club's library. Subscription of individual AGA > memberships could then follow the now existing > individual or group rate plans. If group membership > fufilled the above qualifications I think that we > could sell sfbaaps on perhaps a $100 annual fee? _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc