I would say, either sit tight, or else e-mail them again
asking for
clarification. I DON'T think we should just hand over
$400 without any
further discussion. If they are pretty sure there _were_
49 books, we
should probably give it to them. But it sounds like you
made it clear that
we would straighten it out once they were clear on what
had happened. They
haven't done that yet.
Karen
----- Original Message -----
From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 10:58 AM
Subject: [AGA-sc] Request for opinion re Amano books
We have not heard back from Amano about the 4 books we
did
not pay for and we thought we had better ask again what
others thought.
Here's the story again:
When Nozomi came to me at the convetion to be paid for
the
Amano books sales, he said the count was 49 because 1
had
been given to Tomoko.
But we had gotten a count from Tomoko of 45.
Therefore, at the convention I paid Nozomi for 45 and
told
him that I was doing so based solely on the number from
Tomoko and if that number was in error, to just let me
know
at any time and AGA would make up the diff.
I know Cheryl has asked around and we haven't located
the 4
"Mystery" books.
Seems the possibilities are:
1) 4 books were stolen or misplaced;
2) 4 more books were sold and AGA received payment for
them;
3) Amano grabbed 4 more books for whatever reason and
forgot or forgot to tell Nozomi.
For the first two cases, I think AGA should pay for the
books since they were in our charge. I would doubt the
later case except that Tomoko seems a more reliable
source
of info than Nozomi.
So what do you folks think? Pay $400 more to Amano or
just
sit tight?
sh
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc