Re: [AGA-sc] Board membership

[Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>]

I certainly *do not* think we need anyone to step down. I think it would 
be wise to have an odd number of people on the Board, although tie votes 
have not been a problem. And I think Larry is primed.

I actually think it would be better to have Larry on the BOD in an 
official capacity before much more convention talk goes by. I think he 
might participate more actively and feel like he has more authority to 
speak out in this regard if he were official.

I agree about Phil. He's a good gerbil, and getting better all the time. 
   If I get the chance, I'll talk to him soon about the importance of 
putting a more positive spin on things.

Erik, if you're feeling stressed about these things, then how can we help?

Cheryl



Erik Olson wrote:
> I think we should get our current crises (forum, contest, and most 
> important, 2007 CONVENTION) figured out first.
>
>   - Erik
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, S. Hieber wrote:
>
> > Is it time again to consider appointing more to the Board?
> >
> > sh
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-sc mailing list
> > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc