Re: [AGA-sc] Convention fri nite

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, S. Hieber wrote:

> In the past we've always let host club membership suffice. Is that no so?

If you remember, we had a bit of an issue with the GWAPA members because 
they were significantly cheaper than AGA membership, and we had to insist 
that prior GWAPA members were grandfathered in but new GWAPA memberships 
didn't count.  Or was that DFWAPC?  Naw, I think it was GWAPA.

SFBAAPS membership is FREE.  You just have to be a Bay Area resident. 
They currently have 200 of these free members.  So basically if one went 
by that rule, all local residents would get in without additional 
membership fees.  But in typical SFBAAPS fashion, I suspect they are not 
aware of this tradition.

I just don't know how gracious we're feeling right now.

  1. We could not tell them, and let the bomb explode when all the 
free-loadin' locals figure out they not only have to pay registration, but 
an additional $20, or

  2. We could formalize the agreement to include SFBAAPS memberships, 
meaning that all locals would get in at $59.

If it were just up to me, I don't have the energy for that particular 
fight, so I'd go for #2, knowing it's our last time having to make this 
arrangement.

  - Erik

--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc