On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, S. Hieber wrote:
In the past we've always let host club membership suffice. Is that no so?
If you remember, we had a bit of an issue with the GWAPA members because
they were significantly cheaper than AGA membership, and we had to
insist that prior GWAPA members were grandfathered in but new GWAPA
memberships didn't count. Or was that DFWAPC? Naw, I think it was GWAPA.
SFBAAPS membership is FREE. You just have to be a Bay Area resident.
They currently have 200 of these free members. So basically if one went
by that rule, all local residents would get in without additional
membership fees. But in typical SFBAAPS fashion, I suspect they are not
aware of this tradition.
I just don't know how gracious we're feeling right now.
1. We could not tell them, and let the bomb explode when all the
free-loadin' locals figure out they not only have to pay registration,
but an additional $20, or
2. We could formalize the agreement to include SFBAAPS memberships,
meaning that all locals would get in at $59.
If it were just up to me, I don't have the energy for that particular
fight, so I'd go for #2, knowing it's our last time having to make this
arrangement.
- Erik