Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships

[Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>]

You didn't really misunderstand, because I didn't bring that part up 
before. I was ignoring the Mexicans and Canadians because they are 
charged the same as US members, but the mailing cost is figured as 
foreign. Since it's not itemized by country, there's really no way for 
me to figure that out. So I ignored it.

I guess I have to give my propeller back. :-(

Cheryl



Karen Randall wrote:
> I misunderstood.  I thought you said we were making SOME money on all of 
> them.
> 
> Karen
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com>
> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships
> 
> 
>> One more interesting point to note that if we don't ignore the Canadians
>> and the Mexicans, we are LOSING $0.27 on each one-year membership, and
>> more on discounted multi-year memberships.
>>
>> Which is fine with me as long as overall, TAG is holding its own.
>>
>> Cheryl
>>
>>
>>
>> S. Hieber wrote:
>>> Wel that's the kind of cracker jack financial analysis we pay that darn 
>>> treasurer for.
>> _______________________________________________
>> AGA-sc mailing list
>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc