Try the attached done in Excel version 5 I don't have a special problem with th$800 number. I think its a soft number and I don't have any means tofirm it up so I addressed it only to say I wasn't addressing it. How that for Friday morning tap dance ? ;-) My feeling is that an item should pay its way, especially if it is the mainstay heart and core product of the business. I'd rather we could just lower prices all around. But I think the same fairness that says, lower the foreign prices, says to raise the locals up to carrying their own weight. We'v e been living high off the foreign members and the locals have been sucking up some of that largesse. Time to button up the blouse, so to speak. I share your reluctance but I must follow where my propeller takes me, it being atached an all. sh ----- Original Message ---- From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:33:00 PM Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships S. Hieber wrote: > This is only a 1st draft and maybe I flubbed a cell reference I have an ancient version of Excel. Can you e-mail me one saved as an older version or as a csv or something? > I'm not sure how the $800 per year number was derived Ummmm... guessing. Assumming that all the foreigners were on one-year memberships and calculating the difference and rounding up. > It's been a few years since we increased, hasn't it? > Since I started as membership chair in, say, January of 2003. I really *don't want* to increase the US membership prices. I'm not adamantly against it, just reluctant.
Attachment:
TAG costs & pricing- xl-ver5.xls
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc