Re: [AGA-sc] Pams off sale?

["S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>]

>>>>>comments below
 
---- Original Message ----
From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:49:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Pams off sale?


S. Hieber wrote:
> Why? 

'Cause I'm bored with it?
 
>>>>I'm not moved.

Why did we start it?

To help move the PAMs a little faster.
 
 
 
>>>>I think the PAMs are basically "depreciated" inventory at this point, or 
>>>>nearly so. Thus, I still think we should price them to move. Raising the 
>>>>price won't move them faster.

Did we accomplish our goal?

Some, at first.
 
 
>>>>And still we find that the market value for PAMs is less than anticipated.

Should  we lower the price further, raise it? Is price affecting our 
ability to reach our goal?

Probably not. Do you have any suggestions?
 
>>>I don't see a reason for raising the price. I'd at least leave it as it or, 
>>>my preference, cut it in half, assuming that covers postage. I'd also change 
>>>the 6+4 combo to about $19 (4*$4 plus 6*$1.5=$16).


Cheryl

>  
> sh
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc