[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] Fw: [AGA-conheads] Projections
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Fw: [AGA-conheads] Projections
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Folks that were SFBAAPS members didn't have to become AGA members to reg for
the convention. This policy was the same as prior conventions. But we didn't
want folks signing up with SFBAAPS just to get a cheap membership and reg for
the convention, so there was a cut off date, after which and AGA membership is
required to reg. The suggestion being made by Jim is that we allow newer
members at SFBAAPS to reg without becoming AGA members.
Actually, it could make sense for AGA short-term financially, as would dropping
the membership requirement altogether for that matter. However, and it's a big
however, some folks already got AGA members because they had to for the
convention -- so there are refunds to consider and how do we adjudicate who
merits a refund? It is possible that refunds could exceed the value of the
additional regs we get -- who knows since there's no way to discern the
appropriate amount of refudns. And another big however is that our policy on
the membership requirement wasn't short-term financially based, so the
arguments about possible short-term financial gains might not be particularly
relevent.
I have to wonder if, $20 is a signifiant break point in the demand for
convention regs -- undoubtedly the market is price sensitive. But if we wanted
to use price sentitivity to increase regs it would probalby make more sense to
drop the reg price to say $34 and still require membership rather than drop the
cost for new SFBAAPS members only.
sh
----- Original Message ----
From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 9:49:56 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Fw: [AGA-conheads] Projections
This is what I don't get. What is he talking about. SFBAAPS members were
already grandfathered.
Cheryl
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc