[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] Contest Awards -- Prizes and costs to contestants
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Contest Awards -- Prizes and costs to contestants
- From: Kathy Olson <kathy@thekrib.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:15:42 -0800 (PST)
What about paypal?? I think this is a good option for them rather than
have us absorbing the costs. How many countries don't ahve paypal.
K
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Karen Randall wrote:
> I think that until we think of a better solution, AGA should absorb the
> transaction costs.
>
> Karen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: S. Hieber
> To: aga-sc@thekrib.com
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 11:42 AM
> Subject: [AGA-sc] Contest Awards -- Prizes and costs to contestants
>
>
> Foreign winners in the Aquascaping Contest can face substantial transaction
> fees of about $20 or so to process a foreign check. They would like to avoid
> these costs, especially when the prize is only $25. These transaction fees
> are the result of the prices banks charge for dealing with out-of-country
> checks.
>
> We didn't adequately consider the transaction costs when we decided to offer
> prizes. We committed that oversight when we were going to use vendor donated
> items and then came upon the shipping costs and related problems. We did it
> again when we switched to "cash". This is a Victorian "we;" as the money guy,
> the transaction costs are something I should have thought about and brought
> up way back when. My apologies to the group.
>
> So, in belated restitution let me offer the following options for
> consideration.
>
> I think there are four ways to deal with this:
>
> Whistle-past-the-graveyard options:
> 1) Advise prospective contestants that prizes will be award by check drawn
> upon a USA bank and winners might
> incur transaction charges when they process prize checks (no added
> costs to AGA)
> 2) do as we have been, offering Paypal or mailed cash; (no added costs
> beyond what we pay now, i.e. paypal);
>
> Bite the bullet options:
> 2) getting a credit card and using Western Union; or (added AGA
> costs for card and WU -- about $20-25
> per transaction)
> 3) Going to the bank and purchasing cashier checks. (added AGA costs
> for cashier checks--about $20-$25
> per transaction)
>
> None of these will eliminate all transaction costs for all overseas
> contestants but the last two will mitigate for nearly all and eliminate for
> many. The latter two options would basically mean that the AGA eats about $20
> in additional costs per transaction.
>
> I don't think it would unreasonable for the AGA to take on an additional
> $360-$450 in contest costs to try to absorb most of the transaction fees. I
> know contest participation isn't about the money, but sending someone a prize
> that is virtually consumed by the winner's acceptance of it, well, it just
> doesn't look like our best foot forward.
>
> sh
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc