What about paypal?? I think this is a good option for them rather than have us absorbing the costs. How many countries don't ahve paypal. K On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Karen Randall wrote: > I think that until we think of a better solution, AGA should absorb the > transaction costs. > > Karen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: S. Hieber > To: aga-sc@thekrib.com > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 11:42 AM > Subject: [AGA-sc] Contest Awards -- Prizes and costs to contestants > > > Foreign winners in the Aquascaping Contest can face substantial transaction > fees of about $20 or so to process a foreign check. They would like to avoid > these costs, especially when the prize is only $25. These transaction fees > are the result of the prices banks charge for dealing with out-of-country > checks. > > We didn't adequately consider the transaction costs when we decided to offer > prizes. We committed that oversight when we were going to use vendor donated > items and then came upon the shipping costs and related problems. We did it > again when we switched to "cash". This is a Victorian "we;" as the money guy, > the transaction costs are something I should have thought about and brought > up way back when. My apologies to the group. > > So, in belated restitution let me offer the following options for > consideration. > > I think there are four ways to deal with this: > > Whistle-past-the-graveyard options: > 1) Advise prospective contestants that prizes will be award by check drawn > upon a USA bank and winners might > incur transaction charges when they process prize checks (no added > costs to AGA) > 2) do as we have been, offering Paypal or mailed cash; (no added costs > beyond what we pay now, i.e. paypal); > > Bite the bullet options: > 2) getting a credit card and using Western Union; or (added AGA > costs for card and WU -- about $20-25 > per transaction) > 3) Going to the bank and purchasing cashier checks. (added AGA costs > for cashier checks--about $20-$25 > per transaction) > > None of these will eliminate all transaction costs for all overseas > contestants but the last two will mitigate for nearly all and eliminate for > many. The latter two options would basically mean that the AGA eats about $20 > in additional costs per transaction. > > I don't think it would unreasonable for the AGA to take on an additional > $360-$450 in contest costs to try to absorb most of the transaction fees. I > know contest participation isn't about the money, but sending someone a prize > that is virtually consumed by the winner's acceptance of it, well, it just > doesn't look like our best foot forward. > > sh > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc