I agree, until we have a better option avaialable we absorb the costs. Larry --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote: > I think that until we think of a better solution, > AGA should absorb the transaction costs. > > Karen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: S. Hieber > To: aga-sc@thekrib.com > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 11:42 AM > Subject: [AGA-sc] Contest Awards -- Prizes and > costs to contestants > > > Foreign winners in the Aquascaping Contest can > face substantial transaction fees of about $20 or so > to process a foreign check. They would like to avoid > these costs, especially when the prize is only $25. > These transaction fees are the result of the prices > banks charge for dealing with out-of-country checks. > > We didn't adequately consider the transaction > costs when we decided to offer prizes. We committed > that oversight when we were going to use vendor > donated items and then came upon the shipping costs > and related problems. We did it again when we > switched to "cash". This is a Victorian "we;" as the > money guy, the transaction costs are something I > should have thought about and brought up way back > when. My apologies to the group. > > So, in belated restitution let me offer the > following options for consideration. > > I think there are four ways to deal with this: > > Whistle-past-the-graveyard options: > 1) Advise prospective contestants that prizes will > be award by check drawn upon a USA bank and winners > might > incur transaction charges when they process > prize checks (no added costs to AGA) > 2) do as we have been, offering Paypal or mailed > cash; (no added costs beyond what we pay now, > i.e. paypal); > > Bite the bullet options: > 2) getting a credit card and using Western Union; > or (added AGA costs for card and WU -- about > $20-25 > per transaction) > 3) Going to the bank and purchasing cashier > checks. (added AGA costs for cashier > checks--about $20-$25 > per transaction) > > None of these will eliminate all transaction costs > for all overseas contestants but the last two will > mitigate for nearly all and eliminate for many. The > latter two options would basically mean that the AGA > eats about $20 in additional costs per transaction. > > I don't think it would unreasonable for the AGA to > take on an additional $360-$450 in contest costs to > try to absorb most of the transaction fees. I know > contest participation isn't about the money, but > sending someone a prize that is virtually consumed > by the winner's acceptance of it, well, it just > doesn't look like our best foot forward. > > sh > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc