With regards to Dave's questions, I cannot see any evolutionary advantage in forgetting how to parent, unless of course you had the unfortunate habit of eating your young. If that were the case, laying the eggs and leaving them would be far more advantageous for fry survival, wouldn't it? I know that we are not discussing parents leaving their young here, but that's the only way I can see any advantage in losing parenting skills. I don't think I'm into devolution. (I'm being kind of facetious here). More seriously though - As to the evolutionary value of eating your young, (after watching my roommate's dempseys demolish their 150+ fry in a 90 gal filled with other dempseys and giant danios), I suppose that, as a parent fish, if you had put time and effort (body-mass, really) into generating small reproductions of yourself, if you were convinced that they were not going to survive - for whatever reason - it would make sense to re-enlist the resources you had squandered (eat 'em!) so as to prepare for another, hopefully more successful attempt at reproduction. I don't know if i have figured anything out here - does it make any sense? Dominic Stones Richmond Hill, Ontario Dave Gomerg wrote: >As long as I have gotten started, consider the following questions: > >1. What would be the evolutionary value (if any) of forgetting how to >parent after a few generations? > >2. What would be the evolutionary value (if any) of eating your babies? > >When you get those figured out, you will understand why babies get eaten. >-- >Dave Gomberg, San Francisco mailto:gomberg@wcf.com >Jobe's Fern and Palm Spikes FREE http://www.wcf.com/pam > >----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!