> > I think it's one of those many species where you have a long geographic > range, with > > the fish at the two ends being classified as different species, but with > the dividing > > line hard to find in the middle. It's something I find very difficult with > killie > > species definitions. I haven't heard as much about this question with > Apistos as I > > have with West African fish.Gary, i believe the term is species complex, which describes what you just did above. > You may be right. At the ACA convention I mentioned the same problem with > species of > apistos. Right now there are about 200 physically different forms (taxonomic > species), > but I'm not sure that they are all "biological species". In actuality there > may only be > 30 - 40 different species. I have discussed this problem with other apisto > people and > several of us have come to the opinion that, for now, it is best to split > these fish up > as narrowly as possible, list them as possible species/populations, and not > interbreed > them. If future evidence shows that some of the many populations are the > same species, it > is simple to lump them back together. On the other hand, what happens if we > lump several > populations together as a species, breed them together, and then discover > that we were > actually dealing with multiple sibling species? > not to mention that if you have a nice color form of one species, why dilute it by crossing with another form of the same species? tsuh yang chen, nyc, USA ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!