On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Frangooles, Bob wrote: > Great work Erik. In my opinion this is a good opportunity to improve the > auction performance (though I think our teamwork has been pretty strong and > effective over the last couple of auctions). Exactly what I thought... the team does a great job, but it gets a little stressful when Dave or I or whoever is up there & says "OK, now we're going to auction off FIVE plants at once!". > I think perhaps the user interface on the record a bid could use a little > tuning, but I think the general framework is sound. Yes, please jot down any ideas you might have for this. I think that part is the weakest area so far, but I haven't quite yet figure out what would be better. > It might be tough to run it side by side with the current process during a > real auction. I would suggest maybe a live practice run at a board meeting, > then if we are comfortable, use it for the plant auction with the old method > ready as a backup in case of a hardware/software failure/glitch. We would > probably want to print sorted results periodically throughout the auction in > case of failure. I am sure there also some other failsafes we can discuss. I figure a backup person jotting down each bid would go a long way. And maybe a line printer recording each transaction as it comes in to the database (I wonder if I still have my old line printer...) - Erik -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com