-----Original Message----- From: Erik Olson [mailto:erik@thekrib.com] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 8:11 AM To: gsas-board@thekrib.com Subject: Re: GSAS Email Forum On Thu, 1 May 2003, Rick Rose wrote: > 1) Should the Board establish attendance (and/or other > requirements) to be imposed on its own members in order to "remain as a > board member"? On Thu, 1 May 2003, Erik Olson wrote: While I beleive it is valid (but not necessary) to have the OPTION of revoking the status of a board member, I feel very strongly that this should not be implemented as an "automatic" rule that kicks in after N missed meetings. The benefits I see from such a rule are that it keeps the books cleaner, and it makes things easier on the president and other board members (who now do not have the responsibility of contacting the wayward board member). But the drawbacks are great: First there is a lack of dignity for the person involved; there is no attempt to first find out WHY they are not attending; they are treated like children with "strikes" against them shown in meeting minutes. While some see no insult in that, others (such as myself) do. With "strikes" against me, I am not encouraged to come back and participate. Third, there is no accounting for WHY they may have missed the meetings, and as demonstrated this year, seemingly no attempt to find out. Second point: what is the damage of having an inactive board member still listed? I do not see any. Their name stays on the list until the end of the year, and then presumably they don't get re-elected. Another point I've been trying to make (and perhaps it is only a side issue, so feel free to disregard in this forum) is that it is not clear to me how important attendance IS at board meetings. My experience has been over the past few years that it is easier to get input and a quorum on issues through e-mail forums such as these than at the board meetings themselves. One can review the issues carefully, and compose an answer at their leisure that says exactly what they want. Oftentimes I find that issues get "ramrodded" through at the board meetings without even time to discuss or vote on them. Other issues are discussed ad-nauseum and take up (IMHO) far too much time at the board meetings, and I'd prefer to just skim over and vote yes or no. Finally, a paradox I've noticed: how do we now rectify some of the needs for "special" board members such as (apparently?) the newsletter editor, with such a hardfast rule? If the newsletter editor doesn't need to be at board meetings because they are the newsletter editor (arguably the person who's, in the best of all possible worlds, the most on top of what's going on, because they're the liaison to the general membership every month), why do the other board members have this rule? Now, I'll go with that "be positive" suggestion... what I *think* should be the policy for board membership is this: if a board member is doing actual DAMAGE to the club by non-attendance or other means, they should be asked first if they want to continue on the board. "Hi John, you haven't been at the last few board meetings, and you're supposed to have planned all the speakers for the next year. Are you sure you want to keep doing this, or should we try and find someone else?" The next phase would be to transfer their responsibilities to another, more active, member. When I was president, this ALWAYS worked. In fact, most people were real polite about resigning themselves in advance due to other committments. Clay writes: I do not see any problems with what is proposed above, so long as the Board Members take on their responsibilities to coordinate their attendance or lack of attendance prior to the Board Meetings as well. I do not think the President should be made Emperor, but, neither should the President be made a mother of the club either. I would love to see the club run by simple email, but, that likely will never work for a couple of reasons: 1) Some of us get far too much email on a daily basis to be able to adequately address random (random in timing only) notes such as this one (I personally get between 200 and 300 a day, so, answering email to me is not necessarily fun and is oft times looked upon as work in my mind). 2) Some of us do not even have email addresses or reasons to get one. (No one on the Board is in this situation currently, but, we do have members in this situation) 3) Trying to maintain a readable thread such as this one for an important issue, again such as this one, is very awkward I think. (note: this is all my personal opinion, no concrete data to support all of this, well, except the number of emails I get...~~laughing~~) I do understand the current policy can be offensive to some and for that I think we do need to change....but, how do we find a policy that does not offend anyone? I have not seen anyone in politics (either at club level or higher) who has been able to do this. I wish I had all the answers, I would be Emperor then.....~~laughing til I cry~~....yeah, I am teasing. But, seriously, that is why we are having this discussion, to come up with the best answer possible and I think that is GREAT!! I am rather suprised that there is a feeling that "oftentimes" the Board has "ramrodded" issues through. I have felt that we have given ample opportunity for discussion on all matters in the last 2-3 years (the only time I have been involved with the Board since my long hiatus from the Club). Perhaps, I have been wrong and will reassess this. I do feel it is the Board's and the Membership's responsibility to address any and all concerns that come up within the Club. So, if anyone, and that means ME too, is ramrodding something through, I think it is the responsibility of all those present to make sure this is stopped in a positive, "win-win" approach. I have no problem with others correcting me when I am wrong (I readjusted my approach when Kathy recently pointed out the error of my ways, relative to the upcoming Club Guest Speaker topic, would be a good example) and would hope all of us are that way. The issue of Newsletter Editor and the Board position is an interesting one. I am unsure how to best approach this. I will say it will take alot of coordination amongst the Board and the Editor to make sure we have the best Newsletter possible. I think that we should discuss this item with the Editor and come to an agreement on the best possible format for this communication and work from there. On Thu, 1 May 2003, Erik Olson wrote: > 2) How can we improve participation from the general > membership? Rick's right, this is a totally separate and unrelated topic, should have been in a separate e-mail "forum" after the first one is completed. I have found the best way to get participation has been to involve the membership in the activities. The member profile column, new members list, and even just walking up to people at the meetings helps a lot to this end. Asking a member to host the board meeting/open fishroom is always succesful. I guess this is tangentially related to the first topic, in that I beleive you'll get more participation from non-board-members by making it easier and more fun to be on the board, or even if not on the board, allowing folks to have something they 'do' for the club without a lot of interference, rules, and general red tape. Clay writes: The ideas that Erik points out are all excellent ideas....should we share them with the entire Club at some point? On Thu, 1 May 2003, Erik Olson wrote: > 3) Suggestions for holding general elections for board > members - again, maybe this is a mute point since we've found the bylaws > (or maybe not?) Let's see what comes of it. This should be a moot point, and/or separate discussion. traditionally, nominations from the general membership are held in may, and elections held in June. We discussed at a board meeting a while back of putting them off until the fall, because it would end the problem of changing over a regime during the summer break, and historically the fall tends to be a bit slower than the spring for the club; a perfect time to elect and welcome in a new set of board members (I think the Christmas party is a good day to do the changeover, what with it being a laid-back "fun and distractions" meeting to begin with). The absolute worst experience I had with elections, and probably what we essentially stopped doing them, was trying to coordinate them (AND the nominations which had been blown off the previous month) the same night as a big national speaker. It just eats into the time people would prefer seeing what they came for. OK, 'nuff said. I'm done. - Erik Clay writes: I am everso thankful that Erik found a copy of our bylaws and feel we should definately spend some time to update them to reflect today's more digital World. They seemed out of date, in some areas, the last time I was president in the 80's.....so, I am all for reviewing them and changing them to fit our Club's needs in today's World Finally, I would like to THANK ALL OF YOU for addressing these issues, because if we do not, we will surely parish in a quagmire of disenchantment and possibly resent as well. ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe gsas-board" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/gsas-board When asked, log in as username is "gsas-board", and password "gsas-bored".