Thanks Clay! Rick > Good Afternoon, > > I would just like to toss my two cents into the mix on the Auction > process if I may. I enjoy the process we have now, for reasons similar > to Erik's. I like the opportunity to be moving about and picking up > things at random, to auction off....and I really like being in control > of the flow of the items we auction...ie, mixing the good with the bad > or the new tanks with the old beat, possibly dead back filters and such > that we get. Working with the audience one can get a sense of what they > would like to see and play that to the best advantage of the club I > think. Thus, when I see the interest level starting to drop some I can > auction off a new tank and bring the level back up. This way I can work > to sell off the less desired products in between the more desired ones. > If I didn't have this luxury I would most likely find myself working > with a disinterested audience. The tough part is learning what the > audience is interested in....it seems to change each year. I really > don't think our current process is too much work....it takes time > yes....but, it is fun as we have it. If we lost the fun, I would find > it to be work. Sure, each year I think of things we could do > better....but, we do great as is too! > I do think that each auctioneer needs to know the rules prior to our > start. I think this would have helped Matt some. He got frustrated > when we told him he couldn't do something he was wanting to do, selling > multiple items. Well, I knew we could not do that and I told him > that.....but, he went ahead with it and caused some confusion and > frustration. But, the beauty of our system is, we worked through it. > Now, if we only had one auctioneer and they got to do as they pleased, > we would soon be in chaos I think. > Finally, the mix of personalities putting on the auction I think > attracts the audience into the Auction game.......and, afterall, isn't > Participation a must in any auction? Without it, we won't be selling > much. I agree that with some auctions a serious auctioneer is > necessary. These types of auctions are usually huge ones with very > serious buyers involved in them. We do not have that type of audience > or that much material to auction. > Our auction is in a more intimate environment and is small enough we can > interact with the audience some. I find it amusing and fun to hear how > much people remember our auctions not only because of the items we sell, > but, also because of the way we sell them too. The Auction has become a > show in its own way. > > I wish I could be there for the Board meeting, but, with the kid's > sports and all now, I cannot seem to find the time to make it to the > meetings anymore. I miss them though. But, I know you are all doing a > great job and really appreciate all the time you folks put into the > effort as well. And, as Erik noted, the final decision in this matter > is in your hands. > > Clay > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-gsas-board@thekrib.com > > [mailto:owner-gsas-board@thekrib.com] On Behalf Of Rick Rose > > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:41 PM > > To: 'GSAS Board' > > Subject: FW: Board Meeting - Auction Discussion > > > > Fellow Board Members, > > > > I corresponded with Erik off-list to see if he might be able to attend > > this week's Board Meeting given the fact that Matt Kaufman has > > indicated that he will probably be attending and is wanting to discuss > > our "unique auction methods." Unfortunately, Erik won't be able to > > make it, but he did take the time to provide some good input and he > > gave permission for me to forward his comments to the Board List. I > > will have a copy of Erik's comments with me for reference, but I > > probably won't include it in the text of the agenda, so, please read > > on... > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Erik Olson [mailto:erik@thekrib.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:03 PM > > To: rick-rose@comcast.net > > Subject: Re: Board Meeting - Auction Discussion > > > > Hi Rick, > > > > Matt e-mailed me as well. From his e-mail, I think he definitely > > would > > like to see GSAS go the direction of the other 99% of the clubs out > > there > > in their auctions, i.e. having the auctioneer stand in one place > > while > > people bring things to and from them. He felt it was a lot of work > > running around all evening. Maybe he's right, we do end up working > > all > > three auctioneers ALL night, where other clubs rotate so they're only > > working the auctioneers 1/3 the time, but have more runners to pick up > > the > > slack. But I like our own approach, if only that we're the only club > > that > > has this little quirky system, and also because I think it actually > > works > > very well for us. I actually *enjoy* going and picking up the items I > > sell, coming up with little stupid jokes about them, or combining > > weird > > items into an unexpected lot. Another cool perk is that we can swap > > out > > or add auctioneers completely seemlessly (as worked with Gilead and > > with > > myself last Tuesday). I've seen the other clubs have "slow" > > auctioneers > > that just drag the evening down. WIth us, that's only every 3 items > > at > > worst. > > > > If the issue of selling a dozen of one item comes up, it's important > > to > > note that we CAN do this, but only if the auctioneer and the recorder > > agree to it in advance AND the recorder is ready to jot down all the > > bidders by hand on a piece of paper (and spend the next few minutes > > scanning each won item into the computer & labeling the tags with the > > winners themself). The problem is that once things start going at > > 7:30, > > it's very hard to stop everything and say "OK, let's review some > > basics." > > Better to say "No, no mult items!" > > > > I don't think that "melding" the approaches is necessarily good, > > because > > then you have a group of pre-runners, computer operators, post-runners > > and > > auctioneers, i.e. TWELVE people! Twice as much as we have right now > > (auctioneers and computer people). I think it's far better to stick > > to > > one or the other. Note that with the single-auctineer approach, the > > computer setup typically used is far different than ours. We could > > probably use it, but it would need some modification. > > > > I kinda wish I could be there on Thursday, but kinda am glad I can't. > > > > Kathy's working full days now, and we've got to be packed for Portland > > > > Thursday if we're going to take off when she gets off work Friday > > night. > > Markus is home sick with me today, so they'll be wanting me to do more > > > > work Wednesday and Thursday. What a week. > > > > Hopefully this will be of some use to you -- if you want to forward to > > the > > board or bring to the meeting, that's OK. But this is your guys' > > fight > > now. If you like the current approach, explain why and stick with it! > > > > But there's no reason we can't try something different, right? I > > bucked > > the system when I added the computers. We couln't have done $800+ > > worth > > of splits before then, and now it's pretty painless. > > > > - Erik > > > > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe gsas-board" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/gsas-board > When asked, log in as username is "gsas-board", and password "baba oreilly". > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe gsas-board" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/gsas-board When asked, log in as username is "gsas-board", and password "baba oreilly".