I always like to report back the numbers from the computer, and put it in perspective with previous auctions... 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 bidders 42 28 39 43 30 34 39 38 lots 244 267 242 322 264 259 231 260 gross $ 1977 1195 1299 1636 1327 1180 1624 1479 splits $ 672 146 194 453 265 150 403 413 Way to go folks! Susan posted the actual cash #'s (there are a couple additions...see below), but it looks like the club made $900-1000 on the event after ANW has been paid. Even if we didn't consider the $200 tank, it would still be the highest GROSSING plant auction in "recorded history". But more importantly, take a look at the splits, also a record. Lots of members sold things, the most ever since we started using the computers! The plant auction has always been primarily a member service (as opposed to the general auction, which has historically been the club's big fundraiser). The runners adapted fantastically to the new system, even our younger ones who probably did not realize they'd be having to spell some nasty big words! Rick and Josh kept the computers running without breaking a sweat (except at the end). And we didn't tire out three auctioneers at the same time. Also, the usual bit of criticism...not much, but there are some areas we can improve: The items were recorded between 7:50 and 9:50, so that means about 2 items per minute, not the fastest auctioning we've ever done (which would be last year where we sold 267 items in 90 minutes...3 items per minute). We might want to pick up the pace a little at the beginning next time so we don't have to make up for it in the last 30 minutes. This will be especially important in April where in past years there have been 300-400 items! The computer system and the tags are backwards with respect to each other, so the ops read the bidder # and then sale price, but have to key in sale price, then bidder number. I noticed this at the AGA auction, but totally forgot to fix it. I will try and do this on the tags for the general auction. For the computer ops, it's very important that if you get a red tag and it brings up a generic bid (you have to enter the description), that you also enter the seller number. Clay A showed up late, so we didn't pre-enter his items. He just put his seller # on the red tags and they got entered as they were bid on. Perhaps I can modify the software to require the seller number if the tags are in a certain number range. Any rate, we were OK becauase only one person did this. If there were two, we might have been sunk. I was surprised that we still had the "run on the computers" at the end. Josh was still entering the last 10 or 15 tags, so Rick was having to check out everyone until they were done. I have a couple remedies for this. First, as the thing winds up (last 10 minutes), don't allow anyone to check out, and have both guys entering tags. This will make sure that all items are accounted for. Second, we should have that third computer to act as "swing" at the start and end of the event. Anyone else have any suggestions for improvement? - Erik -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ GSAS-board mailing list GSAS-board@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board