Right, just something like "no checkout in last 10 minutes of auction until all the tags have been recorded". It was only a problem because we did the last half hour at an insane breakneck pace. - Erik On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, DonaldR wrote: > Thanks for all your work Erik! > I had to leave kinda early, and appreciated being able to check out then. I > think you meant just close checkout near the end of the bidding, right? > -Don > > Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: I always like to report back the > numbers from the computer, and put it in > perspective with previous auctions... > > 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 > > bidders 42 28 39 43 30 34 39 38 > lots 244 267 242 322 264 259 231 260 > gross $ 1977 1195 1299 1636 1327 1180 1624 1479 > splits $ 672 146 194 453 265 150 403 413 > > Way to go folks! Susan posted the actual cash #'s (there are a couple > additions...see below), but it looks like the club made $900-1000 on the > event after ANW has been paid. Even if we didn't consider the $200 tank, > it would still be the highest GROSSING plant auction in "recorded > history". But more importantly, take a look at the splits, also a record. > Lots of members sold things, the most ever since we started using the > computers! The plant auction has always been primarily a member service > (as opposed to the general auction, which has historically been the club's > big fundraiser). > > The runners adapted fantastically to the new system, even our younger ones > who probably did not realize they'd be having to spell some nasty big > words! Rick and Josh kept the computers running without breaking a sweat > (except at the end). And we didn't tire out three auctioneers at the same > time. > > Also, the usual bit of criticism...not much, but there are some areas we > can improve: > > The items were recorded between 7:50 and 9:50, so that means about 2 items > per minute, not the fastest auctioning we've ever done (which would be > last year where we sold 267 items in 90 minutes...3 items per minute). > We might want to pick up the pace a little at the beginning next time so > we don't have to make up for it in the last 30 minutes. This will be > especially important in April where in past years there have been 300-400 > items! > > The computer system and the tags are backwards with respect to each other, > so the ops read the bidder # and then sale price, but have to key in sale > price, then bidder number. I noticed this at the AGA auction, but totally > forgot to fix it. I will try and do this on the tags for the general > auction. > > For the computer ops, it's very important that if you get a red tag and it > brings up a generic bid (you have to enter the description), that you also > enter the seller number. Clay A showed up late, so we didn't pre-enter > his items. He just put his seller # on the red tags and they got entered > as they were bid on. Perhaps I can modify the software to require the > seller number if the tags are in a certain number range. Any rate, we > were OK becauase only one person did this. If there were two, we might > have been sunk. > > I was surprised that we still had the "run on the computers" at the end. > Josh was still entering the last 10 or 15 tags, so Rick was having to > check out everyone until they were done. I have a couple remedies for > this. First, as the thing winds up (last 10 minutes), don't allow anyone > to check out, and have both guys entering tags. This will make sure that > all items are accounted for. Second, we should have that third computer > to act as "swing" at the start and end of the event. > > Anyone else have any suggestions for improvement? > > - Erik > > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ GSAS-board mailing list GSAS-board@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board