I'll be getting the guys at daycare 4:30ish, and going home for dinner. I'll head out as soon as I can after that... probably 7ish. - Erik On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Paul Wallace wrote: > Erik: > > By tradition the schedule is food ~6:45 and business by 7:30 but it sounds > like everyone is motivated to make tomorrow efficient. What is your prefered > time? > > Susan, when is your party scheduled? > > I am really looking forward to tomorrow! > > -Paul > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Erik Olson wrote: > >> I can probably manage a variety of times. The kids go to bed at 8 >> normally, but it's OK. >> >> What time are the meetings typically these days? (The last board meeting >> I attended, aside from dropping in at Meredith's 5 blocks from my house, >> was back in 2002 or so, so forgive my rustiness.) >> >> - Erik >> >> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Paul Wallace wrote: >> >>> Erik: >>> >>> As a 'named party' you schedule is important and we welcome your input as >>> to how the web based services are setup and designed to run. Do you have >>> a time window like before the boys are off to bed that we should plan >>> around? >>> >>> -Paul >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Erik Olson wrote: >>> >>>> -2 * 0 = 0 (I'm not a board member!) >>>> >>>> I'm out of here Thursday, taking a red-eye to Hartford Connecticut (and >>>> potentially bringing back some cool plants and/or fish). >>>> >>>> - Erik >>>> >>>> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Paul Wallace wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi: >>>>> >>>>> In light of Susan's observation that the board meeting falls on St. >>>>> Patrick's day and assumption that there are way cooler places to be, I >>>>> would like to float the idea of moving the meeting. This depends >>>>> strongly on our gracious hostess, Phil's work schedule, and if Erik is >>>>> able to make it. So lets go by the points. >>>>> >>>>> If you can make Tuesday, but not Thursday, Reply -2 >>>>> If you want to do Tuesday, Reply -1 >>>>> If you are neutral, Reply -0 >>>>> If you want to do Thursday, Reply +1 >>>>> If you can make Thursday, but not Tuesday, Reply +2 >>>>> >>>>> A positive score in aggregate will be considered strongly if the named >>>>> parties above do not veto. >>>>> >>>>> Otherwise I would suggest the meeting then dinner approach where we start >>>>> the meeting first and then those whom would like to visit with our >>>>> gracious hostess without the burden of all the meeting bits can. With >>>>> the food hostage I think we can break this out in record time. >>>>> >>>>> -Paul >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> GSAS-board mailing list >>>>> GSAS-board@thekrib.com >>>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Erik Olson >>>> erik at thekrib dot com >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> GSAS-board mailing list >>>> GSAS-board@thekrib.com >>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GSAS-board mailing list >>> GSAS-board@thekrib.com >>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board >>> >> >> -- >> Erik Olson >> erik at thekrib dot com >> _______________________________________________ >> GSAS-board mailing list >> GSAS-board@thekrib.com >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board >> > > > _______________________________________________ > GSAS-board mailing list > GSAS-board@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ GSAS-board mailing list GSAS-board@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board