[Ha, the reply-to address works at last!] Total agreement on the points, though I had to think for a minute on the blanket "may be republished in *any* magazine" clause (those sorts of rules usually give me a bad feeling). It's probably OK. On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, James Purchase wrote: > 4. Notice is to be made that images may be adjusted for colour, contrast and > brightness, but that "altered" or "doctored" images will be automatically > rejected [the decision will rest with the Judges and/or Erik, who has the > experience to tell the difference]. Hey, I never said I could tell the difference, I just create them so others can't. :) > 8. We need a "point of contact" for the contest, possibly multiple "points > of contact" - one for information only, another for either information > and/or submission of entries. As it appears that Erik is the one with the > ability to handle the scanning of both prints AND slides, I suggest that he > would be the logical point for "Submission of Entries". No problem. If we get inundated, I can farm out some of the work to any of the other people who've offered to help on this list with their own slide/neg/print scanners. - Erik (Now I test the digest one more time to make sure it's working). -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com