At 01:25 PM 7/15/99 -0500, you wrote: >Olga has been sending me photographs of her tanks lately, and one shot in >particular I just fell for in a big way. It features a beautiful piece of >driftwood and has what appeared in the overall shot to be a really nice, >very large rock in the background, with a lush clump of Val's in the right >center background. What appreared to be overgrown stem plants were obscuring >the view of the rock and I suggested, after looking at the photo for several >minutes, that Olga trim them back to bring out the rock into a more >prominent visual position within the aquascape. > >Much to my shagrin, Olga has just informed me that the "rock" and the "clump >of Val's" are in actuality printed images on the background paper attached >to the back of the tank! > >We are _definately_ going to need detail shots to be able to detect such >things. > >This is no offence to Olga, it is still a beautiful shot of a nice tank, but >she showed me how _easy_ it can be to fool someone's eye. > >James Purchase >Toronto ><blushing a deep shade of crimson> First question, does it matter? If the backgroud is an integral part of Olga's design, doesn't it count? Second, if it _does_ matter, ask people to describe the tank background in their text submission: i.e. "printed commercial background" or "cork with attached Java Ferns" or "black paint" (or in Amano's case, an "infinity panel"<g>) Karen ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@aquatic-gardeners.org with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest