James asked me this privately in e-mail earlier, and I've told him my opinion. Since others are now asking the same question, I'll post it here too. I think "the AGA" will probably support the proposal without requiring the aquascape to be planted for the same reason many of us are: complicated to force, probably not necessary because most of the entries will be planted tanks anyway. In fact, I'd say they'll probably need a lot less convincing than we have. If we pull this off well, it will be the coolest thing to happen to the AGA since it started. Moving to a slightly different topic, I disagree with the posters who've worry that aquascaping has nothing to do with AGA's purpose: I consider 'scaping part of gardening, aquatic or otherwise. Come on, the last few TAG's have even featured recipes for cooking aquatic plants! If you guys like, I could run up ahead on the trail for ya, and ask Master Control (cute, George) if they think aquascaping is something the AGA is supposed to consider on their scope. - Erik Eager to finalize this topic and move on too... -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@aquatic-gardeners.org with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest