Karen wrote: Just for the record, I never seriously presented "Wow factor" as the _name_ of a category. I was trying to get a specific point across. I don't think anyone really expected that "wow factor" would be the wording used in the judging criteria. But it sure got everyone's attention. There was no argument about what I _meant_!<g> I agree and since they essentially mean the same thing, it is a matter or wording. Karen wrote: I'm not sure I'd split the points exactly this way, but I thought we were holding off on that for now? Sorry, jumping the gun a little. I think that I would agree with version C. I don't think that I would mind having a Theme category, but woudn't miss it either. Another possibility is that it could find possibly into the Composition piece. As far as version C goes, I would agree with Jose in part and Justin that I think that Use of Colour, Use of Space, and Balance would be nice subcategories under Composition. Justin wrote: Um, not to be picky, but I think that was Jason, rather than Justin, that proposed the points stuff. I'm quite happy to leave it alone for now. Nice to see, though, that Jasons occasionally get called Justin, 'cause I get it the other way around all the time...:-) First time for me! =) Jason Luebke Minneapolis, MN ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@aquatic-gardeners.org with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest