Dave V. writes, regarding Dave E.'s comments: About the fee in general, I agree with Erik here (I think? It's difficult to keep track). The fee is a way of making sure that people are serious about entering and are serious about the tank they are entering. I don't want to see a picture of an empty tank entitled "Space, the final aquascaping frontier." If I do see it, I want to know the person was serious about the joke (i.e. they paid). About the sponsorship, I've been under the impression almost the entire time here that the AGA isn't going to want us as much as we want the AGA. I have no problem with that because I am interested in the contest and the hobby succeeding, not just the AGA. There was a suggestion right from the start (probably from yours truly, I don't remember) to ditch any kind of sponsorship and do this ourselves. But then where is the publicity? Where is the prestige? Where are the startup funds? I think comparing the AGA to ADA is like comparing apples to oranges (don't kill me on this one, I know that I'm inferring an indirect comparison simply because you made an arbitrary, alternative sponsorship suggestion). The AGA is applying for non-profit status, apparently. ADA is a for-profit company (corporation?). If Mr. Amano wants to do something like this, he will do it himself (or have his minions do it <g>), he won't want to rely on a rag-tag bunch like us (whoa! nobody get offended there! just a joke! well, okay, I guess we're a little bit rag-tag <g>). I guess I've warmed to the fact that the AGA is a good candidate for a sponsor, in my opinion. As for the $5 figure. Well, I don't think that's a lot of money, but I don't know how that will be received in other countries. Although this is an international event, we should consider our target audience which is probably going to consist primarily of 1st and 2nd tier, industrialized nations. However, if it breaks down like this: $50 for posters (sorry, couldn't resist) $20 for judge's CDs $200 for ribbons $80 for certificates $50 for shipping (probably not an accurate figure, I know) and no certificates of participation in this case (note that I have left out prizes and the CD selling venture here as those will, theoretically, pay for themselves) I think the AGA may be able to cover the costs. ($400) Take away the posters, limit the number of "honorable mention" certificates that the judges can award, and get definite numbers on the ribbons and certificates ... it seems workable. The problem I have here, and I may be thinking like someone of relative affluence compared with a third-world nation, is that anything less than $5 is somewhat of a nuisance. It would cost almost as much for the money order as it would for the fee. Okay, okay, so you're saying waive the fee. I don't see that working for the AGA or any organization. These are untested waters (no pun intended). The AGA (or whomever, pretend it's you or me) is running the risk of ponying up four or five hundred bucks with the HOPES that they will make it back in either entrance fees, new memberships, or both. But there are no guarantees! 20 entries (also not an impossible number seeing as how you, Dave Engle, may not even enter) at $5 will only just cover one quarter of the estimate I've given. The AGA will have to eat the rest. So there are risks, and we should be sensitive to that, and try to curb those risks as much as possible. Okay, 'nuff said. Guess I'm being opinionated here, too. I think $5 (US) is a resonable figure for an entrance fee. We could knock $2 or so off for a second entry from the same household, but that's about it, IMHO. Man, I've gotta get away from my computer more often. :-) Dave VanderWall Minneapolis, MN ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@aquatic-gardeners.org with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest