Just a few quick thoughts concerning the commercial/resource linking debate: I would think that a Resources page should be just that - resources only. It should be separate from *any* commercial aspect because of the nature of the event, concerns of "favoritism", etc. If it is to be a true "resource", then any and all who are listed should have an easily evidenced and obvious connection to information, techniques and/or concepts within the structure of the site. Put another way - if I mention "biotope" type aquascaping, and there's a site that can provide information that's either lacking or limited in scope on mine, then I'll point the reader in the right direction. But, as James has mentioned, just because they sell, for instance, realistic shaped and formed backgrounds won't get them on the list. I'm in the business of information, not advertising and marketing - a link to the company's catalog or simply to their home page leaves too much to be freely interpreted by the reader. A link directly to their page on "how to build your own background" is quite a different approach that leaves little freedom for misinterpretation. If, however, the company is among the extreme few providers of a highly desired but even more difficult-to-locate or -obtain item, the link is provided and suggested *as such*. But again, the link that *is* provided leads to the specific reason for choosing that site - the item *in* the catalog, not just simply the catalog or home page. Granted, I don't believe that Erik would enjoy such an addition to his workload if he were to implement the mechanics of the approach, but the criteria itself should, I would hope, shape the resource page itself. A seperate commercial page in an event like this is a plausible approach, but its criteria should be just as firm. And I don't believe it should be an all-inclusive "link farm" in particular. Nor are we in the ad and marketing biz, either. We are trying to promote and enlarge a specific event, and we can cut out *all* possibilities for cries of favoritism or other nasties by simply choosing *those companies directly supporting the event itself*. When you see an event on TV, say a sporting event, do you watch commercials from each and every supplier of baseballs in the world, or just those that are sponsoring the game? During a fund-raising drive supporting any organization, do the sponsors get to emphasize their products over the event, or are they simply listed as sponsors? I would rather see a "Sponsors' Page" than a "Commercial Page" myself. If a company makes *any* contribution of note, it should be included along with accompanying credit for that specific contribution. A "Prize Page" could then simply link particular prizes back to the entry in the Sponsor Page, which in turn links back to the company's own Home Page. I would say that this would also be about the right place to link back to the company's specific page on the prize itself, if available and desireable. You keep away from being able to click *off* of your site without specifically intending them to go there, and we certainly would like them to stick around long enough to find out what the Contest and Showcase is all about. Anyway, that's a quick outline, as I'm on my way to work. I'd thought to throw this out to see what it generates by the time I return... ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest When asked, log in as username is "aga-contest", and password "lookie-loo".