Re: weird entries

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

Right, I think the position is that though the judging is not based on the
quality of the photos, the judges should at least be able to SEE the
aquascapes.  So a REALLY bad photo will indirectly affect the results.

  - Erik

On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, DaTrueDave wrote:

> Are (or have) the judges been made aware that the quality of the photos are
> to have absolutely no factor in scoring?  If the photos suck that bad, the
> judges should base their scoring on what they actually can see, right?  (I'm
> not articulating this the way I want to...)

-- 
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com

  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message.
  To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest"
  in the same message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-contest", and password "lookie-loo".