--- Steven Pituch <spituch@ev1.net> wrote: > My intent in presenting these guidelines was to simplify, > not make the > biotope category more complicated. I think it definitely clarifies, but not necessarily simply. But it's not a simple category. > Not sure if it helps > now after I've > studied the feedback so far. > > Just to clarify. > > The three biotope classifications are presented to the > contestant to help > give direction. If the contestant studies these > classifications and then > can classify his/her entry then he has a better > understanding of biotopes as > defined for the sense of this contest. > The classifications are not meant to be judged > separately. I still believe > that the biotopes should be judged as one category > regardless of size or > classification. So there's no change in this area from > previous contests. > Also this is part of the documentation that is meant to > make the biotope > entries educational. > . . . Biotopers > tend to study the plants they collect, so they appreciate > learning about > prohibited plants, as they are usually prohibited for a > good reason. I > also don't want the contestants to repeat the mistake > I made with my previous entry, showing water hyacinth > floating in my > aquarium, and giving my address as Texas! Maybe we should jsut warn about the issue. It relates to all aquascapes, not just biotopes, no? > > I think that if the AGA were to eliminate the biotope > category > it would disappoint a significant number of its members. Yes. I think the cat is picking up. > You have to > realize that most of us on this list are very much into > aquascaping in some > way or another. However, even though the AGA contest is > not, the AGA itself > is a planted aquaria club. The contest isn't exclusively a planted aquascape contest, but the emphasis has been pretty obvious, seems to me. But I think it does the contest good to have the broader reach, to express the broader interest. > . . . I do think also that eventually aquascaping will > develop > towards more > biotypical arrangements. . .So > biotopes may > influence aquascaping eventually just like the advances > made in technology > to promote the high quality of aquascaping are used by > almost all aquarists. > > So its true that it is an aquascaping contest, and the > biotope category did > not develop > like the other categories. If we really want to make it > a pure aquascaping > contest then we should get rid of the biotope category. Why is a biotope layout not an aquascape? I don't think one is any less so just because it is representational. > But I think then > the AGA > contest would not represent the overall membership as > well as it does now. > If you look at TAG, you see that the articles aren't just > about aquascaping. > Many articles are about the plants themselves such as > where they are > collected, the joy of collecting, and how they grow. > > In any event we need to create a > non-planted > aquascaping category. I'm missing something here. What has non-planted to do with biotopes except that some have few or no plants, while many (most) biotopes do? > If it is decided that the AGA > contest should continue > to have a > biotope category, and if the biotope category is to > survive, it > needs some sort of encouragement in the form of some > guidance. Everyone agrees with this last point, no? Speak up if you disagree. sh ===== - - - - - - - - Erik Olson annouces AGA 2004 Annual Aquascaping Awards at the annual Convention Nov 12, 13 & 14; Details & Registration at www.aquatic-gardeners.org & www.gwapa.org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢ http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest When asked, log in as username is "aga-contest", and password "second".