--- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > Thanks Scott! Comments inline... > > On Fri, 21 May 2004, S. Hieber wrote: > Ah, now I get it.. this must be "Submission > Guidelines"... Yes, sorry. > > Under General Entrance Guidelines, do we need to state > a > > limit on number of entries. > > It sounds cool. Much like the convention limitation > imposed the first > year, it hasn't been an issue, but someday... So I'll > leave it in for > historical coolness and future relevantness... :) When AGA is big enough for 300 entries, we'll probably have capacity to handle 300 entries. :-) > This means that each judge's scores are used to determine > the judge's > individual ranking for the category. The overall > (average) RANKINGS, not > the scores, are used to award first, second and third. Ahhhh. that's diff than I thought. That's more like, uh, the Borda Count method. I'd put it simply enough that even I could understand it on a busy day. Or least narrow down the mathematics: "Each judge will score the entries and assign a rank of First, Second, or Third to the entries that he or she scores highest, next highest and third highest respectively. For each first place ranking by one of the judges, an entry is given 3 ranking points, 2 for second and 1 for third. The entry with the most ranking points wins first, second most ranking points wins second, and thirdmost wins third." Or does the entry with the most first-place rankings win first, etc.? So only those entries that got first place rankings can win first place? See, it could go diff ways even with the same points, ranks, blah blah. > > This gets rid of the scoring bias induced by each judge > (some may only > award half the points and a large fluctuation, while > others score > everything near the top of the points). In past years, > some judges > (notably Neil in year 1) just used the points as a > scratchpad to rank the > tanks that they had pre-ranked on paper. This is also > why I opt not to > show the raw scores to the public -- they're absolutely > meaningless beyond > their use to determine rankings. I will, however, take a > peek at them in > the case of a tie-breaker. I understand. Maybe most folks don't care how we deal with the points -- Just seems like we should say how it done even if, maybe especially if, we don't show the actual math afterwards. No need to show the man behind the curtain but we should say what man and what curtain will be used. > > If an image has the entrant's name of Copyright notice > > superimposed, will it be disqualified from > consideration? > > 'course not. I'll just ask them to resend it or crop it > out. I'd say that right there on the web page -- then they know they're gonna get it right back and probably will fix it ahead of time. > Only one or two guys do that each year. More annoying > are the ones who > include a giant black frame around their photo that I > have to crop out > (wasted space). Do you ask for no frames/borders? Do so if you don't. or say, "Preference is for 'No Borders' on photos since they tend to waste space." Thanks for listening, sh PS: Next year, will the people turn around occasionally and wave at me? ;-) ===== - - - - - - - - She Wrote the book on low maintenance aquatic gardening! Diana Walstad, author of _Ecology of the Planted Aquarium_ Meet her at - The Fifth AGA Annual Convention Details & Registration at www.aquatic-gardeners.org & www.gwapa.org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains ? Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest When asked, log in as username is "aga-contest", and password "second".