[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: [AGA-Contest] My thoughts on the Aquascaping Contest



I have to agree. Based on my experience from judging the 2003 convention, I think this system is due for a rehaul! Glad you've broached the subject, Carlos!

Bailin

From: Ghazanfar Ghori <ghorig@gmail.com>
Reply-To: AGA Aquascaping Contest Planning <aga-contest@thekrib.com>
To: AGA Aquascaping Contest Planning <aga-contest@thekrib.com>
Subject: Re: [AGA-Contest] My thoughts on the Aquascaping Contest
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:57:37 -0500

I agree...time to rethink.


On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:16:09 -0500, Carlos Sanchez
<tsunamicarlos@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> First, I'd like to say that we had the best turnout ever this year -- and
> that is really something to be proud of, especially since American
> participation alone was nearly equal to total participation in previous
> years. With this large boost in numbers and the expansion of the scope of > the contest, I think the contest should also begin to look toward how judges > are chosen. This contest has always been an 'American' contest by the judges
> that have been chosen year to year. I think it is time to make the shift
> completely to 'international' by having representative judges from around > the world --which would necessitate an increase in the number of judges to > at least five or so. Because Asia and Europe alone contribute around 40% of > participation, I think we should have at least two international judges (one > from each of those continents) every year. Token? Perhaps, but the contest > will only expand in scope if the international community is well represented
> in the judging panel.
>
> Second, I think the point system for the judging needs to be rehauled. I
> think there was far too much emphasis on maintenance (and who here wants to > keep tanks only with Anubias barteri var. nana and Java fern for years?). I > believe the categories 'selection and use of materials' and 'composition'
> are redundant. Composition of wood and rock should fall under the same
> category as composition of plants. Fish choice should be given more
> importance, as it is a critical aspect of an aquascape -- the harmony of the
> fish with the plants both in shape, color, and movement (if the judge is
> familiar with the fish, he can make such a judgement).
>
> I think Overall impression is weighted too heavily on the scale. It allows > too much room for subjectivity in an already rather subjective aquascaping
> hobby.
>
> More to come... but here are some initial thoughts,
>
> Carlos
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-Contest mailing list
> AGA-Contest@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-Contest mailing list
AGA-Contest@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest


_______________________________________________
AGA-Contest mailing list
AGA-Contest@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest